Police arrests backfire on Bexley Council proving malfeasance

 

 

One year of COVID-19

 

From all the misconduct at the end of 2019 and the start of 2020, COVID-19 gave this family over a year to strengthen their legal case. They began with a complaint against the Metropolitan Police for wrongfully serving the prevention of harassment letter.

 

First arrest

 

On 15/04/2021 when this family’s complaint against the police began its investigation, a member of their family was arrested, imprisoned, and released without charge. On 29/11/2022 the police wrote that this arrest was unrelated to the 999 call that this family made on 21/03/2021. And, although it was responded to, the police are going to deny they were given any reason for the emergency, or evidence of blood from the crime that was reported.

 

Second arrest

 

Sixteen days after the police wrote these false statements, on 15/12/2022, another member of their family was arrested and imprisoned. As part of this arrest, on 20/12/2022 Bexley Council visited this family’s home to do a 45 day child protection enquiry for their youngest sibling. Bexley Council learned all this was being used against them in court. So, on 03/01/2023, just 6 working days later, most of which being Christmas, Bexley Council stopped their child protection enquiries.

 

On 17/01/2023, the police were told why this council cancelled its enquiry. It appears the police asked this council about this and Bexley Council misinformed them that they had not terminated their responsibility. On 18/01/2023 Bexley Council told this family they needed to start their enquiries again, but because they immediately stopped it again, this was only to mislead the police again.

 

Bexley Council admits malfeasance

 

On 13/02/2023 Bexley Council produced a CF assessment of PersonA’s family (exhibit PP7). It proves this entire case. It skips 2018’s falsified 48 page assessment (exhibit PP6), which raised many child protection concerns, and only refers to the outdated 2016 assessment with no problems (exhibit PP5).

 

Bexley Council question – Are there any other reasons for your assessment of this family in 2023 to not reference 2018’s assessment, other than the fact that it was fabricated?

 

 

Bexley Council executives are still avoiding prison by preventing PersonA from living with their family

 

This lawsuit against Bexley Council continued on 04/04/2023 and deputy director Fiona Cisneros left just a few days later. On 21/04/2023, Hazel Watson of Bexley Council complaints wrote, “Due to the amount of time that has now passed, we are not prepared to look at these issues” (exhibit PP12). But the reason the complaint could not progress was this council’s misconduct.

 

On 27/04/2023 Bexley Council agreed that their apology is useless without PersonA knowing why their family life was taken away. The head of service Corne Van Staden was given information on how FamilyB abuses PersonA. Corne Van Staden made a referral to help PersonA as a vulnerable adult. But she required the social worker Kevin Halpin to manage this with Bexley Council complaints.

 

Bexley Council question – Equality Act 2010 – This Act places a duty on the service provider to ensure they do not subject another person to a detriment because they have made a formal complaint. So, other than instructing Halpin on how to defend this complaint, what was the benefit of discussing a call for help with Bexley’s complaints department?